In this article, you’ll discover everything about the so-called “Freedom Bill,” understand its main points, and learn how it could directly impact your work life. Let’s dive in!

What Is the Flexible Work Constitutional Amendment?

First things first, let’s set the context. Federal Representative Maurício Marcon (Podemos-RS) has filed a Constitutional Amendment Proposal that promises to revolutionize labor relations in the country.

Unlike PEC 8/2025, authored by Representative Erika Hilton, which proposes ending the 6×1 schedule, Marcon’s proposal takes a different approach. Moreover, it’s become popularly known as the “Freedom Bill” due to its focus on worker choice.

But what does this mean in practice? Basically, the proposal defends that you, as a worker, should have the right to decide how many days per week you want to work.

How Does the Proposed Model Work?

Hourly-Based Compensation

To begin with, the main difference in this amendment lies in the payment system. Instead of a fixed monthly salary, the model proposes compensation based on hours actually worked.

This way, the system resembles the American model, where hourly flexibility is more common. As a result, you would have more control over your income and schedule.

Freedom to Choose Your Schedule

Additionally, another crucial point is autonomy in defining working days. Want to work four days a week? You can. Prefer five or even six days? The choice is yours.

Therefore, the proposal seeks to eliminate the rigidity of traditional schedules, allowing each professional to adapt their work to their personal needs and financial goals.

Why Was This Bill Created?

Counterpoint to the 6×1 Schedule Elimination Bill

It’s important to note that this proposal emerges as a direct response to PEC 8/2025. According to Marcon, Hilton’s proposal, though well-intentioned, has authoritarian aspects.

In this sense, he argues that limiting the workweek to 36 hours across only four days prevents workers who want to work more from making that choice. On the other hand, the Flexible Work Bill seeks to give voice to those who want that option.

Economic Concerns

Furthermore, Marcon raises concerns about the economic impacts of forced schedule reduction. Among the main issues are:

• Significant increase in operational costs for employers
• Possible disguised salary reduction to offset expenses
• Adaptation difficulties for small and medium businesses
• Impact on Brazilian market competitiveness

For this reason, the alternative proposal seeks to balance worker protection with economic viability.

What Are the Advantages of the Freedom Bill?

For Workers

First and foremost, let’s talk about the direct benefits for you. With this model, several interesting possibilities emerge:

• Total flexibility: Adapt your schedule according to family or personal needs
• Financial control: Work more hours when you need extra income
• Work-life balance: Reduce your workload when you want more free time
• Transparency: Know exactly how much you earn per hour worked

In this way, you become the protagonist of your professional career.

For Businesses

On the other hand, employers also find advantages in this system. Flexibility allows better cost management and adaptation to market demands.

Consequently, companies can maintain competitiveness without harming their employees. This creates a healthier and more sustainable business environment.

Criticisms and Challenges of the Proposal

Concerns About Labor Rights

However, it’s not all sunshine and rainbows. Labor law specialists warn of possible risks from this flexibility. There’s concern about the precariousness of labor relations.

In this context, important questions arise: how to guarantee benefits like vacation, bonuses, and severance pay in an hourly model? How to protect workers from excessive schedules?

The Risk of “False Freedom”

Moreover, critics argue that, in practice, many workers won’t have real power of choice. In situations of financial need or employer pressure, “freedom” might become an obligation to work more.

Therefore, it will be essential to establish safeguards that protect the most vulnerable in this system.

Comparison: 6×1 Elimination vs. Flexible Work Bill

To better understand the differences, let’s compare the two proposals side by side:

6×1 Schedule Elimination Bill (Erika Hilton)

• Maximum 36-hour weekly schedule
• Work distributed across up to 4 days
• Fixed model for all workers
• Focus on mandatory schedule reduction

Flexible Work Bill (Maurício Marcon)

• No fixed hour limit (respects legislation)
• Worker chooses how many days to work
• Flexible and personalized model
• Focus on autonomy and freedom of choice

In summary, while one proposal establishes rigid limits, the other bets on flexibility and autonomy.

What Do Experts Say?

Economists and legal scholars have divided opinions about both proposals. While some defend the need to update labor laws for the 21st century, others fear social setbacks.

On one hand, labor economics specialists point out that flexibility can increase worker productivity and satisfaction. On the other hand, legal experts warn about the importance of maintaining consolidated basic protections.

Therefore, the debate is far from reaching consensus, and both sides present valid arguments that deserve attention.

How Could This Bill Affect Your Life?

Now, let’s get to what really matters: the impact on your routine. Depending on your situation, this proposal could represent opportunities or challenges.

Possible Scenarios

If you value flexibility: You’ll have more control over your schedule, being able to balance work with studies, family care, or personal projects.

If you need stable income: You might prefer the traditional model, where a monthly salary guarantees financial predictability.

If you’re seeking professional growth: You could strategically work more hours to increase your earnings and invest in qualifications.

In other words, the impact will depend greatly on your profile and life situation.

What’s the Future of These Proposals?

Currently, both constitutional amendments are in the early stages of processing in the National Congress. The Brazilian legislative process is long and complex, involving several stages of analysis and voting.

Additionally, broad debate with civil society, unions, business owners, and specialists will be necessary. After all, constitutional changes about work affect millions of Brazilians.

For this reason, it’s essential to follow developments and actively participate in this democratic debate.

Conclusion: Freedom or Regulation?

In summary, the Flexible Work Constitutional Amendment represents an alternative vision for the future of labor relations in Brazil. While some see freedom and opportunity, others perceive risks of precariousness.

The truth is there’s no perfect solution. Each model has its advantages and disadvantages, and the ideal would be to find a balance that protects hard-won rights without preventing innovation and flexibility.

What about you? What do you think about this proposal? Do you prefer having freedom to choose your schedule, or do you believe clear limits are safer?

Want to dive even deeper into this topic? Keep following our blog for more analyses about labor rights and news from the world of work. Your professional future deserves attention!